The recent “debate” between Alex Jones and Brother Nathaniel touches on the establishment of stock exchanges as a fulcrum of jewish power, with Alex trying (and failing) to claim London’s exchange was a gentile operation. Thank you for making this important information accessible and tying it in to more recent scholarship
Great article. The reason jews and capitalism/money power go together is because it's the most undemocratic form of power, and allows a small number of people to hold all the power in a system by simply stacking capital.
I recommend Sombart's "Traders and Heroes" comparing the values and political tradition of the Anglo-Liberal world and the Prussian-German culture. This conflict was highly emphasized on both sides with liberal countries declaring Germany any enemy of Western Civilization due to its failure to embrace liberal democracy.
In fact, propaganda during WW2 from the Atlantic side was a recreation of WW1 propaganda with Nazi's being the rebirth of the evil Prussian authoritarian threat to democracy and freedom. It was only decades after WW2 did anti Nazism become focused upon antisemitism and the holocaust.
This conflict between German-Prussian and Anglo-Atlantic culture is not talked about anymore, the far right today tends to latch on exclusively to the antisemitic world outlook that was thrust to the forefront of German nationalist politics after the rise of Bolshevism and WW1 defeat. I happen to have the unpopular opinion in these circles that the conflict between these 2 political traditions is still the real conflict of out time and the future of the West.
The German political tradition is not merely in conflict with liberalism but is ultimately the antithesis of what is today considered to be conservative or RW politics due to the dominance of Anglo American culture. Nothing can highlight that more than one of the premier conservatives in the old German culture Oswald Spengler referring positively to the German political tradition as "authoritarian socialist".
Today, it is why we have "anti globalist" conservatives celebrating an Argentina men declaring the State as evil and needing to be abolished thus giving power to everything they claim to be opposed to. This merchant-"RW" outlook is incapable of understanding the way power works nor the type of political structure(Authority & Socialism) needed to combat it. Until this merchant money worshiping RW tradition is combated nothing can be done to combat the powers that needed to be combated. It is the culture of the Knight vs the culture of the Merchant.
Sorry for writing my own version of a substack post in your comments.
Milei is part of the tribe but claims he wants to 'convert' to Judaism and runs to the hollering wall as one of his first acts as Argentina's president. The lies they won't tell. See what you think of these physiognomies.
What do you think of Russia’s form of state controlled capitalism that leans toward public benefit over private benefit being a useful antidote to Jewish capitalism?
Great piece, Joey. I just order Sombart's book. Are you familiar with the economist Michael Hudson? I just ran across a fascinating interview with him. His economics seems extremely compatible with national socialism, though I expect he'd recoil at the suggestion. He basically points to non-productive finance capitalism as the major ill of our world (though he certainly doesn't connect it to Jews).
It is an interesting article but since Jews are a religion, surely they should be compared to other religions and not racially/culturally to Asians for example?
In terms of achievement Christians clearly stand out. Even in regard to Nobel Prizes, much touted by Jewish supremacists, many who are called Jews were not Jews. They had either one Christian parent, were atheists, or, for example like Albert Einstein, the son of atheists and educated by the Catholics.
It is because Jews like to treat themselves as a race, that they can drag in any achiever on the basis of one parent, grandparent, great-grandparent being a follower of Judaism and claim him or her as their own.
Jews are not a race. No religion makes a race. It is impossible for any religion to create a genetic marker. Yes, DNA can be handed down through intermarriage, but many religions practised this until they realised that intermarriage creates genetic deformities and the group dies out.
Modern genetics says, with a trivial difference between what we once called races, that there are no races anyway and certainly no religious racial groups. It is farcical to claim that a religion creates intelligence. Indeed, if it did then Israel would be a testament to intelligence and not a testament to infantile hysteria, stupidity, sadistic cruelty and bestial savagery. The primitive nature of the Israeli State makes it very clear that Jews excel in nothing but egotism, paranoia, aggression and savagery. After all, never before have so many Jews, been put in one place and funded to the tune of trillions. The outcome should have been everything Jews claim for themselves and it is not.
Jews are tribal and cult-like, more so since Zionism was invented, but always inclined to look after their own, employ their own, empower their own and promote the power of the tribe/religion/group. When because of the power of Zionist propaganda playing the holocaust card and the guilt factor, Jews are also supported and promoted by non-Jews, it does not take long for the group/tribe to gain dominance in any field.
If a Jew and a Hindu apply for a job and the Jew is rejected, they can play the anti-semitic card in ways the Hindu cannot. Guess when push comes to shove who will be chosen? Not hard to guess.
How deluded you goyim can be? As Ashkenazis we are an ethnic group, regardless of our religious affiliation. Hollywood is full of atheist Ashkenazis and the whole concept of Zionism is based on the belief that Jews are a separate nation/race. The founding father of Zionism himself was an atheist and so he didn't believe in Hebrew mythology.
Since ancestry tests reveal what is called Ashkenazi DNA appears in Muslims, Christians, Hindus and Atheists, patently there is nothing Jewish about it. Ashkenazi are basically Germans.
There is no such thing as an atheist Jew just as it is impossible for there to be an atheist Christian.
Zionists were deluded. Jews are not a nation or a race. It is scientifically, genetically, biologically impossible for any religion to create a genetic marker.
It is all mythology. Herzl may have been an atheist but he believed in the Judaic mythology that Jews were superior as humans and Palestine belonged to Jews. He was deluded and deranged and so are most Israelis and all of their supporters.
Ancestary tests say whatever people want. Which is why, in regards to Ashkenazi's, you can find genetic tests that give completely contradictory results. There is no clarity whatsoever or consensus
'The Jews' are from Judea or the house of Judah. Judah, brought us Judaism and later zionism. The real irony is Jewish scholars saying that Judah was a non Israelite tribe. The Greek word used in the bible for 'Jew' comes from a Hebrew word, meaning 'Of Judah'. The Cheif Rabbi of Great Britian in 1918 said all the worlds Jews were from the tribes Judah or Benjamin. You will see that is a pretty consistent theme echoed by many Jewish scholars over the years.
After the Roman sacking of Jerusalem and the temple , many retreated back to Babylon and remained until it went Muslim around the 7th and 8th century,. though some Talmudic schools stayed in Bablyon for several centuries after.
Then, in the 8th century they populated (invaded) the Iberian peninsula riding in on and helping with the Muslim invasion. Heinrich Graetz goes over this period in his Magnus Opus on Jewish History in great detail. They became the Sephardic
Also in the 8th century; Famed Russian Historian & Ethnologist, Lev Gumilev dedicated many years to the Khazars
“These Jewish merchants settled in large number in the Khazar capital Itil, and by the eighth century they had formed a foreign elite and gained ever-increasing political influence. The situation came to a head in the early ninth century when a Jewish prince seized power and made Rabbinic Judaism the official religion of state. The coup was resisted by the local population, and led to a bloody civil war which the Jewish caste won by hiring mercenaries. Although the mass of ethnic Khazars were eventually constrained to submit to the authority of the Jewish elite, they never converted to Judaism, which remained exclusively the faith of the political authorities. With this, Gumilev concludes, Khazaria was transformed into a full-fledged ethnic chimera. “In their very own country,” the Khazars became “the conquered, disenfranchised, and powerless subjects of a government that was foreign to them in terms of its ethnicity, its religion, and it goals.”
They became the Ashkenazi
The Sephardic were kicked out of Spain in 1492, Many came to the new world with Columbus, some went back to Palestine (and created the Lurianic Kabbalah), others dispersed through western europe
The Ashkenazi-ruled Khazar Empire collaped in the 10th century, then scattered thoughout Eastern europe and Germany. By the 17th century, Poland had 3-5 million Jews living in a state within a state. Then Russia annexed Ukriane and the 'Pale of Settlement' was created. Which is where revolutionary communism and Zionism both took hold. Dr Chas Weizman (The first president of Israel) goes over that era in very candid detail. How they just split the Jewish masses down the middle. One side became communist revolutionaries they other side became communist revolutionaries
Yes have read all that but thanks for repeating it here. I merely make the point that a. the stories about Jews are religious stories and not history nor archaeology, and b. it is genetically impossible for any religion to create a genetic marker. and in the earliest times, like everyone, the Jews took converts, females, by force.
Yeah I think it's a little more than just silly Russians picking up the Torah and getting confused and demanding Palestine. lol
you are being simplistic. Because Judaism takes in converts (on rare occasion) does not make Jewish dispora fake. There was a few mass conversions in late antiquity as well
'Ethnic Jew' is a thing. Karl Marx was an ethnic Jew from a long line of prominent rabbis going back to the 10th century
Benjamin Disraeli prime minster of Great Britain in the 19th century was an ethnic jew who converted to Christianity. That was a geniune conversion unlike many others. Once you convert to Christianity, you are out of the tribe. Your jew card is revoked
The renowned Jewish scholar Jacob Neusner, makes clear a distinction between Judaists and Jews, when he says: “The ethnic group does not define the religious system.... All Judaists—those who practice the religion, Judaism—are Jews, but not all Jews are Judaists. That is to say, all those who practice the religion, Judaism, by definition fall into the ethnic group, the Jews, but not all members of the ethnic group practice Judaism.”
However, Neusner adds, tellingly, that Christianity plays a special role in defining who counts as a Jew either ethnically or religiously: “the ethnic community opens its doors not by reason of outsiders’ adopting the markers of ethnicity... but by reason of adopting what is not ethnic but religious.... While not all Jews practice Judaism, in the iron-clad consensus among contemporary Jews, Jews who practice Christianity cease to be part of the ethnic Jewish community, while those who practice Buddhism remain within.”
Look I understand all of that. Perhaps I was not clear enough.
I was trying to make the point that regardless of what Jews might think about themselves or what Judaism teaches, it does not make it a reality.
Judaism teaches Jews are the only true humans. That is patently ridiculous and without any substance. Sure Jews can believe that but it does not make it true and in the modern age, it just makes them look silly.
I don't recall talking about silly Russians picking up the Torah, getting confused and demanding Palestine.
The obsession with Palestine comes from Judaic mythology, that there is something special about Jerusalem and Palestine because Jews camped there for a time. Again, none of that has any historical or legal validity. Nice story for the religion but never meant to be literal. Indeed, as many orthodox Jews said when Zionism was invented.
You said:. Because Judaism takes in converts (on rare occasion) does not make Jewish dispora fake.
I never said it did or that the Diaspora was fake. Jews have lived in dozens of countries around the world for centuries. The idea that was a Diaspora comes from the Judaic fairy tales about a mythical Israel and a long lost Judea.
You said: 'Ethnic Jew' is a thing.
Ethnic Jews is only a thing as an irrational belief based in no scientific, biological or historical reality. The Jews could believe they were ethnic Martions and it would mean as much.
Disraeli was not an ethnic Jew. He was English and his religion was Christianity.
Neusner again, is interesting in terms of the religion and its various definitions but nothing he said has any substance in reality, science, biology or law.
Judaic hatred of Christians is ancient and what you say makes sense. I doubt they knew many Buddhists thousands of years ago so not enough time to learn to hate them. Anyway, Buddhists would say they are not a religion.
Everything you say is relevant in terms of the religion. It makes no sense in a modern world or legally, historically or biologically. The most ridiculous fantasy is that there is such a thing as an atheist Jew. Yes, I know you would fit this into the Judaic teachings you have repeated here, but with our modern understanding of law, biology, history, it is ridiculous.
Listen, let's say you might even be objectively true. That still doesn't change the fact how the majority of Hollywood producers, bankers, media moguls, etc. view themselves despite their lack of religiosity. They are Zionists and thus they view themselves as Jews and view everybody else as 'the goyim'.
I'm also an atheist and an Ashkenazi and I was raised in the belief that I'm Jewish and thus separate from 'standard' Europeans/white people.
The view you're so obsessively trying to defend here is not the view shared by the majority of people around the world, because Zionists won the cultural war so to speak against the non-Zionist religious Jews, so the world accepted the Zionist perspective as the mainstream position.
Well, there are plenty of people in psychiatric wards who consider themselves to be Jesus Christ, Martians, Genghis Khan or some such so the fact some non-Jews and Zionists who think they are Jews when they are atheists does not count for much.
The fact that you were raised with irrational racist beliefs does not make you or your beliefs valid in any way.
I am not sure what you think your last para is grounded in. Most people around the world do not think about or care about Jews or Zionists and even in the Western world, Jews, Zionists and Israel are largely irrelevant.
Well they were until the genocidal slaughter in the Gaza concentration camp which has achieved the result of informing more people around the world of the psychopathic evil which is Zionism in general and Zionist Israel in particular and indeed all those who support it.
The mainstream position of most people on the planet does not even know what a Zionist perspective is, let alone accept it as a mainstream position.
If you were brainwashed as a child as you say, then you live in a bubble and your capacity to have access to facts and reality is limited if nonexistent and your ability to coherently assess things regarding Zionism, Judaism, Israel is nonexistent.
It is because I have studied and been exposed to mental illness in others that I can discern it in Zionists, Israelis and Jews who support Ziorael’s atrocities. Anyone brainwashed from birth as you have admitted you were, would be wise to undergo some form of psychotherapy in order to achieve mental health. It is harder to do it for a culture, religion, State and political movement as required for Zionist Israel but if each individual is encouraged to move beyond the cult environment then gradually the mindset changes and that changes the society. Although Israel is probably too severely mentally ill to be saved as a State. For its own sake and that of everyone else it needs to be dismantled.
Hence they are, in fact, a race. The truth be told, there are far more Jews in the United States and the world than Google claims. They act racially, they inbreed, and we can see by the specific diseases that affect them in particular, like schizophrenia, they are genetically particular. That being said, I’m also an identity Christian, so for me the Jews are, in fact, the children of the devil as scripture maintains. They may have come out from of us, but they are still different.
It is impossible for a religion to create a race. It is genetically and scientifically impossible for a convert to Judaism to magically have a genetic marker created.
NO RELIGION MAKES A RACE. Jews comprise all so-called races and dozens of nationalities. Trust me the DNA of an Ethiopian Jew is very different to that of a blue-eyed blonde Scandinavian Jew.
Jews act tribally not racially. There is no racial acting. What we call differences are cultural not racial.
IF PEOPLE INBREED THEY DIE OUT BECAUSE IT PRODUCES GENETIC DEFORMITIES. Study the Parsis of India if you do not believe me. Better still, study genetics.
There are no specific diseases to any religion. What ancestry DNA scams say is Jewish/or Ashkenazi appears in Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Muslims and atheists. There is nothing Jewish about it.
Humans are individuals and there is no generic Jew just as there is no generic Christian.
Religion is simply a tool to maintain consensus and cohesion among its adherents, and to keep others out, and in this way is a tool Jews use very effectively. They identify by their religion, not by race regardless of what the Israeli government would desire.
The problem with Israel and Jews is that the most powerful factor is the combination of Zionism, a fascist, racist political party and the supremacist and paranoid factors in Judaism.
This all boils down to "Jews didn't play fair like we Europeans understand fairness." If this is all true then historically Jews appear to have played a good game and continue to do so, high IQ or not. Moreover, I don't see how fair Europeans were when they colonised, enslaved and exploited for their wealth in the past. Just because the Jewish playbook continues to reap them success as a collective diaspora, whereas colonialism went past its sell-by date, doesn't mean there's anything more nefarious going on than there is in any other sphere of current human endeavour predicated on power—it's all ridden with nepotism and the notion of meritocracy has been proven to be a scam in Europe, America, and everywhere else.
You think so? The Palestinians, Lebanese and Syrians would not agree. Neither would anyone who believes in principles of justice, rule of law, democracy, human rights and common human decency.
"It is safe to say that the power to amass capital quickly and then bankroll institutions — once again largely through finance, real estate, private equity, and so on —rather than objective individual merit is more influential "
"When independent actors decide to play the money game according to the stealth rules of the winners — trickery, speculative conspiracies, pump-and-dumps — suddenly Jeremy Bentham’s “Nightwatchman state,” unable to restrict or fight the power of rapacious oligarchy, nevertheless remains strong enough to crush its opponents.
The SEC then passed new rules to prevent the new broader access to the market provided by apps and chatrooms from allowing this type of challenge to Jewish finance from ever materializing again."
Calvin Coolidge described the influence of Jewish lore, Jewish law, Jewish culture and the Jewish spirit, as expressed in the Bible, upon the development of the United States. He quoted the historian, Lecky, who said that “Hebraic mortar cemented the foundations of American democracy.”
The puritans who founded the New England colonies as a “biblical commonwealth” were about as Jewish as Anglo Christians could get, with their emphasis on communal enforcement of biblical law, both moral and civil, coupled with their immensely legalistic and ideological mode of scholarship and thinking. As Calvinists, they called themselves the (modern-day) Israelites and quite literally believed they were the chosen few who would be saved, considering everyone else to basically be immoral heathens. The parallels are astounding.
The discrepancy between Jewish and Asian power could be due to GFP (general factor of personality, basically how sociable and hard working you are). Have you looked into that?
>A mountain of studies have proven beyond reasonable doubt that the United States functions as an oligarchy.
I don't buy the GFP argument. Let's say for the sake of argument that Jews are more sociable and hard working than East Asians, we would have to argue the same is true for South Asians viz-a-viz white non-Jewish Americans, since Indians get more corporate promotions than whites.
Few would argue that Indian men are more charismatic or assertive than Europeans by nature.
Would you agree that the growing gap between South Asians and whites when it comes to management promotions is a product of institutional discrimination (affirmative action, DEI, etc)?
As for the US being an oligarchy, there are so many studies and books on the topic it would be impossible to list them all.
The reason we have several people in our congress in their 80s and even 90s is because they build quid pro quo relationships with billionaires and lobbyists who furnish them with so much cash that opponents, both in primaries or opposing parties, struggle to compete.
>I don't buy the GFP argument. Let's say for the sake of argument that Jews are more sociable and hard working than East Asians, we would have to argue the same is true for South Asians viz-a-viz white non-Jewish Americans, since Indians get more corporate promotions than whites.
This isn't valid reasoning, Indians could be more successful (if they even are) for other reasons than Jews.
>Few would argue that Indian men are more charismatic or assertive than Europeans by nature.
That's not necessarily what GFP is. It could be tangibly more like worth ethic and obedience, which Indians are stereotyped as having more of, in my anecdotal experience. One could even argue that low GFP tends to be more assertive.
>Would you agree that the growing gap between South Asians and whites when it comes to management promotions is a product of institutional discrimination (affirmative action, DEI, etc)?
Probably in part, but also Indians may just be more willing to work more for less pay and poorer working conditions.
>As for the US being an oligarchy, there are so many studies and books on the topic it would be impossible to list them all.
There's a serious dearth of studies actually. I'm deeply read and have written a great deal on this topic, more than you I'd bet.
>The reason we have several people in our congress in their 80s and even 90s is because they build quid pro quo relationships with billionaires and lobbyists who furnish them with so much cash that opponents, both in primaries or opposing parties, struggle to compete.
It could also be because younger people are dumber and gayer due to the pervasive dysgenics ruining our society.
From the perspective of the Germans, Werner Sombart did not make a good name for himself through his writings on the Jewish question - if one simply understands him directly. However, it is necessary to view him in the context of his time, which was just before World War I. Even though Bismarck had introduced social laws about 20 years earlier, the Germans were still under pressure to prevent socialist movements, such as those occurring in the Russian Empire. The situation at the time did not really look rosy, and definitely, social upheavals were still present. For this reason, one must ask why the apartheid of the Jews was so central in Europe. It is not as simple as one might think, that Jews could not study, but the academy was not benevolent towards them in this regard. Max Weber also saw this, who was massively against this attitude of the academy and repeatedly emphasized how his ideal type should not be misused to mean that it wanted to depict reality; Sombart did not adhere to this. Even if Sombart’s ideal-typical analysis was technically correct in the scientific view of the time, it is nevertheless clearly antisemitic to read, because it precisely does not grasp the core of why social action is charged with certain types and precisely in this process, the phenomena emerge - it simply reduces them like the science of racial hygiene at the time. The problem here is much more the question of why an image of a Jew was necessary in the purpose-rational world of the early 20th century? And precisely this question allows us to read the problems in this way before World War II.
Not even close. You clearly haven't read the text; he has 3 rational approaches to this question, where merely one of these is the scientific approach. He analyzes social/cultural factors, economic, and religious.
Would you not say that he pursues anti-Semitic tendencies? Even Ebner, who edited the complete works of Sombart here in Germany, is aware of his motives at the time - although it must be read that the anti-Semitic motives were quite common at the time, as were the racist ones in Kant. Starting with Weber, Sombart’s research belongs to the then "Rassenhygiene" (racial hygiene) and he also uses the method of the ideal type; I would advise you to get historically smart before you throw such claims into the room, which clearly take into account the historical background and his anti-Semitism in Sombart research here in the country.
Nevertheless, I insist that these motives have their social reasons and cannot be attributed to Sombart himself. The historical context is crucial here, as anti-Semitism in this form only arises against the background of social upheavals, precisely because it requires a figure who must be mystified as a scapegoat.
Weber was able to escape the mystification, Sombart could not.
I'll assume you're writing in good faith but throwing the word anti-Semitism around may lead to much confusion. To the extent that he is anti-Semetic is to the judgement of the reader. If Werner Sombart is anti-Semetic it is to the extent that he is a Christian Gentile which is by definition spiritually and religiously anti-Semetic and by extension politically. Sombart categorically rejects any sort of ideological characterizations of the Jewish people and coldly analyzes the facts. In fact, he praises them many times for their innovative and pioneering spirit which motivates new developments in Capitalism. There is no such "mystification" at play here.
"Historical context" is a load of nonsense. How about we discuss the merit of the ideas?
I'm Jewish myself, yet I'm also interested in the topic. Some humans have this thing called intellectual curiosity which is usually paired with a disdain towards low IQ ad hominem arguments.
You should better ask yourself, why are you so obsessed about this subject that you go to a placee where it's being discussed (even though it supposedly doesn't interest you in the slightest) only to post your completely unproductive vitriol. I hope you're a fellow Jew at least, otherwise your virtue-signaling like that is just pure goyish stupidity, and most importantly, a complete waste of your precious time.
The recent “debate” between Alex Jones and Brother Nathaniel touches on the establishment of stock exchanges as a fulcrum of jewish power, with Alex trying (and failing) to claim London’s exchange was a gentile operation. Thank you for making this important information accessible and tying it in to more recent scholarship
I checked the original German text: the passage is as follows regarding the quote including Slavs:
"Das nur noch von Slaven, Negern, und Juden bewohnt sein wird und in dem die Juden..."
"Slav" translates to "Slaw" or "Slawiche" (Slavic)
Whereas clearly it is written "Slaven" that translates to "Slave". A classic misdirection throwing in the Slavic people's lot in with the Jews.
Explains the differences between the English translations, where Slav turns to slum.
Slaves in German is written as "Sklawen", not "Slawen".
Great article. The reason jews and capitalism/money power go together is because it's the most undemocratic form of power, and allows a small number of people to hold all the power in a system by simply stacking capital.
I recommend Sombart's "Traders and Heroes" comparing the values and political tradition of the Anglo-Liberal world and the Prussian-German culture. This conflict was highly emphasized on both sides with liberal countries declaring Germany any enemy of Western Civilization due to its failure to embrace liberal democracy.
In fact, propaganda during WW2 from the Atlantic side was a recreation of WW1 propaganda with Nazi's being the rebirth of the evil Prussian authoritarian threat to democracy and freedom. It was only decades after WW2 did anti Nazism become focused upon antisemitism and the holocaust.
This conflict between German-Prussian and Anglo-Atlantic culture is not talked about anymore, the far right today tends to latch on exclusively to the antisemitic world outlook that was thrust to the forefront of German nationalist politics after the rise of Bolshevism and WW1 defeat. I happen to have the unpopular opinion in these circles that the conflict between these 2 political traditions is still the real conflict of out time and the future of the West.
The German political tradition is not merely in conflict with liberalism but is ultimately the antithesis of what is today considered to be conservative or RW politics due to the dominance of Anglo American culture. Nothing can highlight that more than one of the premier conservatives in the old German culture Oswald Spengler referring positively to the German political tradition as "authoritarian socialist".
Today, it is why we have "anti globalist" conservatives celebrating an Argentina men declaring the State as evil and needing to be abolished thus giving power to everything they claim to be opposed to. This merchant-"RW" outlook is incapable of understanding the way power works nor the type of political structure(Authority & Socialism) needed to combat it. Until this merchant money worshiping RW tradition is combated nothing can be done to combat the powers that needed to be combated. It is the culture of the Knight vs the culture of the Merchant.
Sorry for writing my own version of a substack post in your comments.
Milei is part of the tribe but claims he wants to 'convert' to Judaism and runs to the hollering wall as one of his first acts as Argentina's president. The lies they won't tell. See what you think of these physiognomies.
https://www.startpage.com/av/proxy-image?piurl=https%3A%2F%2Ftse2.explicit.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DOIP.ew0kMB-Vf5MtkzK0-XXsbwHaEK%26pid%3DApi&sp=1708550493T2d94909b2b6a8e7fe49b92d527732328839373f4a246a897bc834940a28813a2
What do you think of Russia’s form of state controlled capitalism that leans toward public benefit over private benefit being a useful antidote to Jewish capitalism?
Great piece, Joey. I just order Sombart's book. Are you familiar with the economist Michael Hudson? I just ran across a fascinating interview with him. His economics seems extremely compatible with national socialism, though I expect he'd recoil at the suggestion. He basically points to non-productive finance capitalism as the major ill of our world (though he certainly doesn't connect it to Jews).
https://youtu.be/4cQbyYBUvzY?si=5KbSQGmbQmaP1Mu1
So, what good is Hudson, ultimately?
Fantastic Post Joe.
Thank you- a grounded, fact based counterpoint to the current zeitgeist
It is an interesting article but since Jews are a religion, surely they should be compared to other religions and not racially/culturally to Asians for example?
In terms of achievement Christians clearly stand out. Even in regard to Nobel Prizes, much touted by Jewish supremacists, many who are called Jews were not Jews. They had either one Christian parent, were atheists, or, for example like Albert Einstein, the son of atheists and educated by the Catholics.
It is because Jews like to treat themselves as a race, that they can drag in any achiever on the basis of one parent, grandparent, great-grandparent being a follower of Judaism and claim him or her as their own.
Jews are not a race. No religion makes a race. It is impossible for any religion to create a genetic marker. Yes, DNA can be handed down through intermarriage, but many religions practised this until they realised that intermarriage creates genetic deformities and the group dies out.
Modern genetics says, with a trivial difference between what we once called races, that there are no races anyway and certainly no religious racial groups. It is farcical to claim that a religion creates intelligence. Indeed, if it did then Israel would be a testament to intelligence and not a testament to infantile hysteria, stupidity, sadistic cruelty and bestial savagery. The primitive nature of the Israeli State makes it very clear that Jews excel in nothing but egotism, paranoia, aggression and savagery. After all, never before have so many Jews, been put in one place and funded to the tune of trillions. The outcome should have been everything Jews claim for themselves and it is not.
Jews are tribal and cult-like, more so since Zionism was invented, but always inclined to look after their own, employ their own, empower their own and promote the power of the tribe/religion/group. When because of the power of Zionist propaganda playing the holocaust card and the guilt factor, Jews are also supported and promoted by non-Jews, it does not take long for the group/tribe to gain dominance in any field.
If a Jew and a Hindu apply for a job and the Jew is rejected, they can play the anti-semitic card in ways the Hindu cannot. Guess when push comes to shove who will be chosen? Not hard to guess.
How deluded you goyim can be? As Ashkenazis we are an ethnic group, regardless of our religious affiliation. Hollywood is full of atheist Ashkenazis and the whole concept of Zionism is based on the belief that Jews are a separate nation/race. The founding father of Zionism himself was an atheist and so he didn't believe in Hebrew mythology.
Since ancestry tests reveal what is called Ashkenazi DNA appears in Muslims, Christians, Hindus and Atheists, patently there is nothing Jewish about it. Ashkenazi are basically Germans.
There is no such thing as an atheist Jew just as it is impossible for there to be an atheist Christian.
Zionists were deluded. Jews are not a nation or a race. It is scientifically, genetically, biologically impossible for any religion to create a genetic marker.
It is all mythology. Herzl may have been an atheist but he believed in the Judaic mythology that Jews were superior as humans and Palestine belonged to Jews. He was deluded and deranged and so are most Israelis and all of their supporters.
Ancestary tests say whatever people want. Which is why, in regards to Ashkenazi's, you can find genetic tests that give completely contradictory results. There is no clarity whatsoever or consensus
'The Jews' are from Judea or the house of Judah. Judah, brought us Judaism and later zionism. The real irony is Jewish scholars saying that Judah was a non Israelite tribe. The Greek word used in the bible for 'Jew' comes from a Hebrew word, meaning 'Of Judah'. The Cheif Rabbi of Great Britian in 1918 said all the worlds Jews were from the tribes Judah or Benjamin. You will see that is a pretty consistent theme echoed by many Jewish scholars over the years.
After the Roman sacking of Jerusalem and the temple , many retreated back to Babylon and remained until it went Muslim around the 7th and 8th century,. though some Talmudic schools stayed in Bablyon for several centuries after.
Then, in the 8th century they populated (invaded) the Iberian peninsula riding in on and helping with the Muslim invasion. Heinrich Graetz goes over this period in his Magnus Opus on Jewish History in great detail. They became the Sephardic
Also in the 8th century; Famed Russian Historian & Ethnologist, Lev Gumilev dedicated many years to the Khazars
“These Jewish merchants settled in large number in the Khazar capital Itil, and by the eighth century they had formed a foreign elite and gained ever-increasing political influence. The situation came to a head in the early ninth century when a Jewish prince seized power and made Rabbinic Judaism the official religion of state. The coup was resisted by the local population, and led to a bloody civil war which the Jewish caste won by hiring mercenaries. Although the mass of ethnic Khazars were eventually constrained to submit to the authority of the Jewish elite, they never converted to Judaism, which remained exclusively the faith of the political authorities. With this, Gumilev concludes, Khazaria was transformed into a full-fledged ethnic chimera. “In their very own country,” the Khazars became “the conquered, disenfranchised, and powerless subjects of a government that was foreign to them in terms of its ethnicity, its religion, and it goals.”
They became the Ashkenazi
The Sephardic were kicked out of Spain in 1492, Many came to the new world with Columbus, some went back to Palestine (and created the Lurianic Kabbalah), others dispersed through western europe
The Ashkenazi-ruled Khazar Empire collaped in the 10th century, then scattered thoughout Eastern europe and Germany. By the 17th century, Poland had 3-5 million Jews living in a state within a state. Then Russia annexed Ukriane and the 'Pale of Settlement' was created. Which is where revolutionary communism and Zionism both took hold. Dr Chas Weizman (The first president of Israel) goes over that era in very candid detail. How they just split the Jewish masses down the middle. One side became communist revolutionaries they other side became communist revolutionaries
Yes have read all that but thanks for repeating it here. I merely make the point that a. the stories about Jews are religious stories and not history nor archaeology, and b. it is genetically impossible for any religion to create a genetic marker. and in the earliest times, like everyone, the Jews took converts, females, by force.
Yeah I think it's a little more than just silly Russians picking up the Torah and getting confused and demanding Palestine. lol
you are being simplistic. Because Judaism takes in converts (on rare occasion) does not make Jewish dispora fake. There was a few mass conversions in late antiquity as well
'Ethnic Jew' is a thing. Karl Marx was an ethnic Jew from a long line of prominent rabbis going back to the 10th century
Benjamin Disraeli prime minster of Great Britain in the 19th century was an ethnic jew who converted to Christianity. That was a geniune conversion unlike many others. Once you convert to Christianity, you are out of the tribe. Your jew card is revoked
The renowned Jewish scholar Jacob Neusner, makes clear a distinction between Judaists and Jews, when he says: “The ethnic group does not define the religious system.... All Judaists—those who practice the religion, Judaism—are Jews, but not all Jews are Judaists. That is to say, all those who practice the religion, Judaism, by definition fall into the ethnic group, the Jews, but not all members of the ethnic group practice Judaism.”
However, Neusner adds, tellingly, that Christianity plays a special role in defining who counts as a Jew either ethnically or religiously: “the ethnic community opens its doors not by reason of outsiders’ adopting the markers of ethnicity... but by reason of adopting what is not ethnic but religious.... While not all Jews practice Judaism, in the iron-clad consensus among contemporary Jews, Jews who practice Christianity cease to be part of the ethnic Jewish community, while those who practice Buddhism remain within.”
Look I understand all of that. Perhaps I was not clear enough.
I was trying to make the point that regardless of what Jews might think about themselves or what Judaism teaches, it does not make it a reality.
Judaism teaches Jews are the only true humans. That is patently ridiculous and without any substance. Sure Jews can believe that but it does not make it true and in the modern age, it just makes them look silly.
I don't recall talking about silly Russians picking up the Torah, getting confused and demanding Palestine.
The obsession with Palestine comes from Judaic mythology, that there is something special about Jerusalem and Palestine because Jews camped there for a time. Again, none of that has any historical or legal validity. Nice story for the religion but never meant to be literal. Indeed, as many orthodox Jews said when Zionism was invented.
You said:. Because Judaism takes in converts (on rare occasion) does not make Jewish dispora fake.
I never said it did or that the Diaspora was fake. Jews have lived in dozens of countries around the world for centuries. The idea that was a Diaspora comes from the Judaic fairy tales about a mythical Israel and a long lost Judea.
You said: 'Ethnic Jew' is a thing.
Ethnic Jews is only a thing as an irrational belief based in no scientific, biological or historical reality. The Jews could believe they were ethnic Martions and it would mean as much.
Disraeli was not an ethnic Jew. He was English and his religion was Christianity.
Neusner again, is interesting in terms of the religion and its various definitions but nothing he said has any substance in reality, science, biology or law.
Judaic hatred of Christians is ancient and what you say makes sense. I doubt they knew many Buddhists thousands of years ago so not enough time to learn to hate them. Anyway, Buddhists would say they are not a religion.
Everything you say is relevant in terms of the religion. It makes no sense in a modern world or legally, historically or biologically. The most ridiculous fantasy is that there is such a thing as an atheist Jew. Yes, I know you would fit this into the Judaic teachings you have repeated here, but with our modern understanding of law, biology, history, it is ridiculous.
Listen, let's say you might even be objectively true. That still doesn't change the fact how the majority of Hollywood producers, bankers, media moguls, etc. view themselves despite their lack of religiosity. They are Zionists and thus they view themselves as Jews and view everybody else as 'the goyim'.
I'm also an atheist and an Ashkenazi and I was raised in the belief that I'm Jewish and thus separate from 'standard' Europeans/white people.
The view you're so obsessively trying to defend here is not the view shared by the majority of people around the world, because Zionists won the cultural war so to speak against the non-Zionist religious Jews, so the world accepted the Zionist perspective as the mainstream position.
Well, there are plenty of people in psychiatric wards who consider themselves to be Jesus Christ, Martians, Genghis Khan or some such so the fact some non-Jews and Zionists who think they are Jews when they are atheists does not count for much.
The fact that you were raised with irrational racist beliefs does not make you or your beliefs valid in any way.
I am not sure what you think your last para is grounded in. Most people around the world do not think about or care about Jews or Zionists and even in the Western world, Jews, Zionists and Israel are largely irrelevant.
Well they were until the genocidal slaughter in the Gaza concentration camp which has achieved the result of informing more people around the world of the psychopathic evil which is Zionism in general and Zionist Israel in particular and indeed all those who support it.
The mainstream position of most people on the planet does not even know what a Zionist perspective is, let alone accept it as a mainstream position.
If you were brainwashed as a child as you say, then you live in a bubble and your capacity to have access to facts and reality is limited if nonexistent and your ability to coherently assess things regarding Zionism, Judaism, Israel is nonexistent.
You sound like someone who should pay a visit to a psychiatric ward yourself.
It is because I have studied and been exposed to mental illness in others that I can discern it in Zionists, Israelis and Jews who support Ziorael’s atrocities. Anyone brainwashed from birth as you have admitted you were, would be wise to undergo some form of psychotherapy in order to achieve mental health. It is harder to do it for a culture, religion, State and political movement as required for Zionist Israel but if each individual is encouraged to move beyond the cult environment then gradually the mindset changes and that changes the society. Although Israel is probably too severely mentally ill to be saved as a State. For its own sake and that of everyone else it needs to be dismantled.
👏👏👏great analysis Roslyn Ross , I want to repost it!
Feel free to repost.
Hence they are, in fact, a race. The truth be told, there are far more Jews in the United States and the world than Google claims. They act racially, they inbreed, and we can see by the specific diseases that affect them in particular, like schizophrenia, they are genetically particular. That being said, I’m also an identity Christian, so for me the Jews are, in fact, the children of the devil as scripture maintains. They may have come out from of us, but they are still different.
It is impossible for a religion to create a race. It is genetically and scientifically impossible for a convert to Judaism to magically have a genetic marker created.
NO RELIGION MAKES A RACE. Jews comprise all so-called races and dozens of nationalities. Trust me the DNA of an Ethiopian Jew is very different to that of a blue-eyed blonde Scandinavian Jew.
Jews act tribally not racially. There is no racial acting. What we call differences are cultural not racial.
IF PEOPLE INBREED THEY DIE OUT BECAUSE IT PRODUCES GENETIC DEFORMITIES. Study the Parsis of India if you do not believe me. Better still, study genetics.
There are no specific diseases to any religion. What ancestry DNA scams say is Jewish/or Ashkenazi appears in Christians, Hindus, Buddhists, Muslims and atheists. There is nothing Jewish about it.
Humans are individuals and there is no generic Jew just as there is no generic Christian.
Religion is simply a tool to maintain consensus and cohesion among its adherents, and to keep others out, and in this way is a tool Jews use very effectively. They identify by their religion, not by race regardless of what the Israeli government would desire.
The problem with Israel and Jews is that the most powerful factor is the combination of Zionism, a fascist, racist political party and the supremacist and paranoid factors in Judaism.
This all boils down to "Jews didn't play fair like we Europeans understand fairness." If this is all true then historically Jews appear to have played a good game and continue to do so, high IQ or not. Moreover, I don't see how fair Europeans were when they colonised, enslaved and exploited for their wealth in the past. Just because the Jewish playbook continues to reap them success as a collective diaspora, whereas colonialism went past its sell-by date, doesn't mean there's anything more nefarious going on than there is in any other sphere of current human endeavour predicated on power—it's all ridden with nepotism and the notion of meritocracy has been proven to be a scam in Europe, America, and everywhere else.
Organized Jewry is better compared to a Mexican drug cartel or ISIS.
https://onenessofhumanity.wordpress.com/2024/12/21/the-bibi-files-documentary-film-presents-the-real-benjamin-netanyahu/
You think so? The Palestinians, Lebanese and Syrians would not agree. Neither would anyone who believes in principles of justice, rule of law, democracy, human rights and common human decency.
This piece resonates because of a couple of analogues
--> Often wonder why senior managers and the CEO of every company you join displays a "toxic" leadership style? Studies instead show that inversely "a toxic attribute" is a selection criteria for those leadership positions [https://iveybusinessjournal.com/publication/the-allure-of-toxic-leaders-why-followers-rarely-escape-their-clutches/] in the same way that jewish attributes described below.
"It is safe to say that the power to amass capital quickly and then bankroll institutions — once again largely through finance, real estate, private equity, and so on —rather than objective individual merit is more influential "
--> The only person jailed from the 2008 financial crash was a non-Jew Rajaratnam who went for many years in jail while Steve Cohen got away free. He outwitted the SEC [https://www.wsj.com/articles/outwitting-the-fbi-and-the-sec-1486511759] Now parse this -->
"When independent actors decide to play the money game according to the stealth rules of the winners — trickery, speculative conspiracies, pump-and-dumps — suddenly Jeremy Bentham’s “Nightwatchman state,” unable to restrict or fight the power of rapacious oligarchy, nevertheless remains strong enough to crush its opponents.
The SEC then passed new rules to prevent the new broader access to the market provided by apps and chatrooms from allowing this type of challenge to Jewish finance from ever materializing again."
Calvin Coolidge described the influence of Jewish lore, Jewish law, Jewish culture and the Jewish spirit, as expressed in the Bible, upon the development of the United States. He quoted the historian, Lecky, who said that “Hebraic mortar cemented the foundations of American democracy.”
The puritans who founded the New England colonies as a “biblical commonwealth” were about as Jewish as Anglo Christians could get, with their emphasis on communal enforcement of biblical law, both moral and civil, coupled with their immensely legalistic and ideological mode of scholarship and thinking. As Calvinists, they called themselves the (modern-day) Israelites and quite literally believed they were the chosen few who would be saved, considering everyone else to basically be immoral heathens. The parallels are astounding.
Thank you!! This explains so much and makes it more coherent for me
Well written 👏
The discrepancy between Jewish and Asian power could be due to GFP (general factor of personality, basically how sociable and hard working you are). Have you looked into that?
>A mountain of studies have proven beyond reasonable doubt that the United States functions as an oligarchy.
That's one study and it fails to replicate in other datasets, I think this is because varies but policy domain https://x.com/BronskiJoseph/status/1739410199243272230
I don't buy the GFP argument. Let's say for the sake of argument that Jews are more sociable and hard working than East Asians, we would have to argue the same is true for South Asians viz-a-viz white non-Jewish Americans, since Indians get more corporate promotions than whites.
Few would argue that Indian men are more charismatic or assertive than Europeans by nature.
Would you agree that the growing gap between South Asians and whites when it comes to management promotions is a product of institutional discrimination (affirmative action, DEI, etc)?
As for the US being an oligarchy, there are so many studies and books on the topic it would be impossible to list them all.
The reason we have several people in our congress in their 80s and even 90s is because they build quid pro quo relationships with billionaires and lobbyists who furnish them with so much cash that opponents, both in primaries or opposing parties, struggle to compete.
>I don't buy the GFP argument. Let's say for the sake of argument that Jews are more sociable and hard working than East Asians, we would have to argue the same is true for South Asians viz-a-viz white non-Jewish Americans, since Indians get more corporate promotions than whites.
This isn't valid reasoning, Indians could be more successful (if they even are) for other reasons than Jews.
>Few would argue that Indian men are more charismatic or assertive than Europeans by nature.
That's not necessarily what GFP is. It could be tangibly more like worth ethic and obedience, which Indians are stereotyped as having more of, in my anecdotal experience. One could even argue that low GFP tends to be more assertive.
>Would you agree that the growing gap between South Asians and whites when it comes to management promotions is a product of institutional discrimination (affirmative action, DEI, etc)?
Probably in part, but also Indians may just be more willing to work more for less pay and poorer working conditions.
>As for the US being an oligarchy, there are so many studies and books on the topic it would be impossible to list them all.
There's a serious dearth of studies actually. I'm deeply read and have written a great deal on this topic, more than you I'd bet.
>The reason we have several people in our congress in their 80s and even 90s is because they build quid pro quo relationships with billionaires and lobbyists who furnish them with so much cash that opponents, both in primaries or opposing parties, struggle to compete.
It could also be because younger people are dumber and gayer due to the pervasive dysgenics ruining our society.
If you can form an evidence backed argument refuting my theory I will gladly read it and respond.
Jew - religion.
Asian - cultural.
Apples with apples works best. Either comparing religions or cultures but not mixed up.
From the perspective of the Germans, Werner Sombart did not make a good name for himself through his writings on the Jewish question - if one simply understands him directly. However, it is necessary to view him in the context of his time, which was just before World War I. Even though Bismarck had introduced social laws about 20 years earlier, the Germans were still under pressure to prevent socialist movements, such as those occurring in the Russian Empire. The situation at the time did not really look rosy, and definitely, social upheavals were still present. For this reason, one must ask why the apartheid of the Jews was so central in Europe. It is not as simple as one might think, that Jews could not study, but the academy was not benevolent towards them in this regard. Max Weber also saw this, who was massively against this attitude of the academy and repeatedly emphasized how his ideal type should not be misused to mean that it wanted to depict reality; Sombart did not adhere to this. Even if Sombart’s ideal-typical analysis was technically correct in the scientific view of the time, it is nevertheless clearly antisemitic to read, because it precisely does not grasp the core of why social action is charged with certain types and precisely in this process, the phenomena emerge - it simply reduces them like the science of racial hygiene at the time. The problem here is much more the question of why an image of a Jew was necessary in the purpose-rational world of the early 20th century? And precisely this question allows us to read the problems in this way before World War II.
Not even close. You clearly haven't read the text; he has 3 rational approaches to this question, where merely one of these is the scientific approach. He analyzes social/cultural factors, economic, and religious.
Would you not say that he pursues anti-Semitic tendencies? Even Ebner, who edited the complete works of Sombart here in Germany, is aware of his motives at the time - although it must be read that the anti-Semitic motives were quite common at the time, as were the racist ones in Kant. Starting with Weber, Sombart’s research belongs to the then "Rassenhygiene" (racial hygiene) and he also uses the method of the ideal type; I would advise you to get historically smart before you throw such claims into the room, which clearly take into account the historical background and his anti-Semitism in Sombart research here in the country.
Nevertheless, I insist that these motives have their social reasons and cannot be attributed to Sombart himself. The historical context is crucial here, as anti-Semitism in this form only arises against the background of social upheavals, precisely because it requires a figure who must be mystified as a scapegoat.
Weber was able to escape the mystification, Sombart could not.
I'll assume you're writing in good faith but throwing the word anti-Semitism around may lead to much confusion. To the extent that he is anti-Semetic is to the judgement of the reader. If Werner Sombart is anti-Semetic it is to the extent that he is a Christian Gentile which is by definition spiritually and religiously anti-Semetic and by extension politically. Sombart categorically rejects any sort of ideological characterizations of the Jewish people and coldly analyzes the facts. In fact, he praises them many times for their innovative and pioneering spirit which motivates new developments in Capitalism. There is no such "mystification" at play here.
"Historical context" is a load of nonsense. How about we discuss the merit of the ideas?
I'm Jewish myself, yet I'm also interested in the topic. Some humans have this thing called intellectual curiosity which is usually paired with a disdain towards low IQ ad hominem arguments.
You should better ask yourself, why are you so obsessed about this subject that you go to a placee where it's being discussed (even though it supposedly doesn't interest you in the slightest) only to post your completely unproductive vitriol. I hope you're a fellow Jew at least, otherwise your virtue-signaling like that is just pure goyish stupidity, and most importantly, a complete waste of your precious time.
Using the word “goyish” unironically is pretty cringe, ngl
Then you must've spent very little time among people speaking Yiddish...
And you have?
Of course, my entire family does.
Interesting. Are they part of a religious community, or just strongly “culturally Jewish”?
Nothing to do with my original comment, just generally curious about anything to do with the Yiddish language in America