>I don't buy the GFP argument. Let's say for the sake of argument that Jews are more sociable and hard working than East Asians, we would have to argue the same is true for South Asians viz-a-viz white non-Jewish Americans, since Indians get more corporate promotions than whites.
This isn't valid reasoning, Indians could be more successfu…
>I don't buy the GFP argument. Let's say for the sake of argument that Jews are more sociable and hard working than East Asians, we would have to argue the same is true for South Asians viz-a-viz white non-Jewish Americans, since Indians get more corporate promotions than whites.
This isn't valid reasoning, Indians could be more successful (if they even are) for other reasons than Jews.
>Few would argue that Indian men are more charismatic or assertive than Europeans by nature.
That's not necessarily what GFP is. It could be tangibly more like worth ethic and obedience, which Indians are stereotyped as having more of, in my anecdotal experience. One could even argue that low GFP tends to be more assertive.
>Would you agree that the growing gap between South Asians and whites when it comes to management promotions is a product of institutional discrimination (affirmative action, DEI, etc)?
Probably in part, but also Indians may just be more willing to work more for less pay and poorer working conditions.
>As for the US being an oligarchy, there are so many studies and books on the topic it would be impossible to list them all.
There's a serious dearth of studies actually. I'm deeply read and have written a great deal on this topic, more than you I'd bet.
>The reason we have several people in our congress in their 80s and even 90s is because they build quid pro quo relationships with billionaires and lobbyists who furnish them with so much cash that opponents, both in primaries or opposing parties, struggle to compete.
It could also be because younger people are dumber and gayer due to the pervasive dysgenics ruining our society.
>I don't buy the GFP argument. Let's say for the sake of argument that Jews are more sociable and hard working than East Asians, we would have to argue the same is true for South Asians viz-a-viz white non-Jewish Americans, since Indians get more corporate promotions than whites.
This isn't valid reasoning, Indians could be more successful (if they even are) for other reasons than Jews.
>Few would argue that Indian men are more charismatic or assertive than Europeans by nature.
That's not necessarily what GFP is. It could be tangibly more like worth ethic and obedience, which Indians are stereotyped as having more of, in my anecdotal experience. One could even argue that low GFP tends to be more assertive.
>Would you agree that the growing gap between South Asians and whites when it comes to management promotions is a product of institutional discrimination (affirmative action, DEI, etc)?
Probably in part, but also Indians may just be more willing to work more for less pay and poorer working conditions.
>As for the US being an oligarchy, there are so many studies and books on the topic it would be impossible to list them all.
There's a serious dearth of studies actually. I'm deeply read and have written a great deal on this topic, more than you I'd bet.
>The reason we have several people in our congress in their 80s and even 90s is because they build quid pro quo relationships with billionaires and lobbyists who furnish them with so much cash that opponents, both in primaries or opposing parties, struggle to compete.
It could also be because younger people are dumber and gayer due to the pervasive dysgenics ruining our society.
If you can form an evidence backed argument refuting my theory I will gladly read it and respond.