As anti-Israel sentiment creeps into mainstream conservative discourse, a number of Jewish authors — some who try to interface with white radicals — have sought to counter this rising tendency with proverbial Pavlovian bell-ringing: opposition to Zionism is the agenda of “brown people,” “the woke left,” “anti-whites,” and “Third Worldism.”
The term “Third Worldist” has become (regardless of what it once meant) a term to basically get white people to support neo-liberalism by appealing to “racism” (which has a very loose meaning).
I would bet members of the formerly termed “alt-right” strategically are more supportive of Niger than any Western European government. Not out of a love for black people, but simply because Niger is doing things they wish they could do, and because they are making a stand against the Global American Empire.
The question is this: “Is the right wing dumb?”
If they are, then they will be hoodwinked. If not they will see through this.
Thanks for addressing the vagueness of how people use these terms. I know what I envision when I hear the term "third world." However, even though unpleasant behaviors happen in these geographic locations, their governments are joining BRICS. Excellent remarks as always.
Anyone doing anything significant to fight against the Satanic left is currently in the third-world. That's the reality of the matter. Africa is the only place on Earth where Christianity is really flourishing. Leftists are functionally white-supremacists (or more specifically Jewish supremacists) when it comes to foreign policy because they realize modern Jews and their gentile white allies are the most degenerate, "progressive" race on Earth.
This is an inconvenient fact for both the right and the left, but it doesn't have to be. The west is basically dead. If you want to save what "the West" once was, your best bet is in so called "second world" and "third world" countries like Russia, El Salvador, and Uganda. If Afghanistan were Christian I'd add it to the top of the list. Their reforms are extremely impressive.
On the other hand, if you want to fight for "the West" as some kind of fixed racial-geopolitical entity, then you should join Richard Spencer in voting for the democratic party. They're not as keen on sacrificing their dominance as some think they are. They're just smart about it. They know they can import a slave class of immigrants and get away with it as long as they keep them dependent on welfare and throw their children in government schools, but they will certainly ensure the survival of their people and a future for their race, if not any of the lower classes of whites.
I would gladly sacrifice my standard of living and reside in a third world or second world soviet-bloc tier country if it was 90% white.
The term “Third Worldist” has become (regardless of what it once meant) a term to basically get white people to support neo-liberalism by appealing to “racism” (which has a very loose meaning).
I would bet members of the formerly termed “alt-right” strategically are more supportive of Niger than any Western European government. Not out of a love for black people, but simply because Niger is doing things they wish they could do, and because they are making a stand against the Global American Empire.
The question is this: “Is the right wing dumb?”
If they are, then they will be hoodwinked. If not they will see through this.
The West IS The Third World!
Phenomenal article, Joe. I have nothing else to add other than say that you are brilliant. I mean that from the bottom of my heart.
Thanks for addressing the vagueness of how people use these terms. I know what I envision when I hear the term "third world." However, even though unpleasant behaviors happen in these geographic locations, their governments are joining BRICS. Excellent remarks as always.
Anyone doing anything significant to fight against the Satanic left is currently in the third-world. That's the reality of the matter. Africa is the only place on Earth where Christianity is really flourishing. Leftists are functionally white-supremacists (or more specifically Jewish supremacists) when it comes to foreign policy because they realize modern Jews and their gentile white allies are the most degenerate, "progressive" race on Earth.
This is an inconvenient fact for both the right and the left, but it doesn't have to be. The west is basically dead. If you want to save what "the West" once was, your best bet is in so called "second world" and "third world" countries like Russia, El Salvador, and Uganda. If Afghanistan were Christian I'd add it to the top of the list. Their reforms are extremely impressive.
On the other hand, if you want to fight for "the West" as some kind of fixed racial-geopolitical entity, then you should join Richard Spencer in voting for the democratic party. They're not as keen on sacrificing their dominance as some think they are. They're just smart about it. They know they can import a slave class of immigrants and get away with it as long as they keep them dependent on welfare and throw their children in government schools, but they will certainly ensure the survival of their people and a future for their race, if not any of the lower classes of whites.
God bless the destruction of the Judaeo-American government.
What are you waiting to move to Transnistria, then? They even have a jewish tankie prime minister, like you people like