Joe you really are the Thucydides of our age, or perhaps our Edward Gibbon. Future generations will want to know what in blazes brought this empire down, and your writings, commentary and journalism will be a prime source. You are a true scholar, and a workhorse at that, bless your heart.
I have no idea who those people you mentioned were, but Joe is the Eric Striker of our time. 'Nuff said. HAIL STRIKER!!!
In all seriousness, Joe's analysis is amazing in many ways. He sees what ZOG sees/knows, but from the perspective of someone who isn't a demonic parasite.
The degree of filth promoted and created by the US ruling elite is staggering. Hopefully this farce of an empire will soon end; one way or another. Thank you Mr. Jordan.
Joseph, I recently read the Niall Ferguson article “We’re All Soviets Now” linked through a Russian nationalist telegram channel, and it seems to be highly convergent with if not directly influenced by this ongoing series of yours. For major distinctions, Niall does not address the Jewish element at all in his piece, and he more laments than derides the degeneration of American society for the disadvantage it will cause the US in its struggle against the “Chinese Axis” in this new Cold War. This is of course a struggle in which he hopes the American empire prevails. Despite these distinctions, the similarities of his piece are so striking that I couldn’t help but wonder if there were not some direct material theft at hand. I would be curious to hear your thoughts on the matter . . .
This has been my pet peeve for a long time. Elites across the world follow the prestige trail and tend to imitate the political, economic, and cultural norms of the most powerful and prestigious power in the region.
There are deep historical precedents for this.
Most of Western Europe after the fall of the Western Roman Empire was not Christian. Germans were forcibly Christianized by Charlemagne but Scandinavia and Poland were never conquered. They voluntarily Christianized and established the catholic and manorial system. Why? Because that's what the Franks did.
The power and prestige of the Frankish realms were so great that others attempted to emulate it and adopted their civilizational model.
Same with Russia and Byzantium. Russians had to choose from Orthodox Christianity, Islam, and Judaism but went for Orthodoxy because they were awed by the splendor and sophistication of Constantinople and the Byzantine Empire.
In the 18th century, all of Europe adopted the model of the French court and royal and ducal courts spoke French. Even distant Russia and French enemies like Holland and Austria. Why? Because France was the most populous and most powerful country in Europe. Her achievements in culture and science were rivaled by none. And the splendor of Versailles awed all.
Elites everywhere adopted the French model as it was the most prestigious.
The same with Britain. Most of the world didn't have parliaments at the start of the 19th century but by the beginning of the 20th, they did. The power and prestige of the British Empire that dominated the world caused everyone to make overtures toward parliamentary democracy and capitalism.
It's the same thing with the US. The wealth, power, and prestige of America captivated the world throughout the Cold War. Everyone wanted to be like her.
This ofc went into overdrive after American victory in the Cold War and elites around the world adopted American-style feminism, sexual freedom, individualism, low culture, and negrolatry.
There's no reason to believe that this status quo will continue forever. Very soon, America could very well become low status and uncouth, and elites embarrassed to be associated with the values it promotes.
Nye’s theory is correct. Soft power is efficient in its use of resources as compared to coercive power. Also its core is based in voluntary decision making. But at the root of success for soft power to work it has to be universally inspiring. It has to be based on the natural law of mankind. Encompassing the values of family, community, loyalty and compassion.
Jesus Christ is the perfect example of soft power emanating from the concept of the natural order. He was right in exclaiming that the “deniers” , the ones whose faith was based on his emergence, and who should have easily recognised him, are the people who worship Satan. We see these same people exercise soft power using Satan’s values. Universally unacceptable values that alienate the best of all peoples everywhere. For the first time in history their expulsion will be spherical not just local
The comparison of the Su-57 and the F-35 hurts the factuality of your article. The Su-57 is inferior in stealth, but the most important distinction are numbers: the Russians haven‘t produced many of them; you should look up the production numbers of the F-35.
One should rather question if American Aerial Superiority is still the huge forces multiplier it used to be in past decades considering advanced developements in missile and drone technology as a way of delivering payloads at substancial lower cost and with greater tactical and strategic flexibility.
This is looking purely at specs and numbers, rather than research capability and practicality. The F 35 costs around $110 million per jet (a lot more if we take into account insane $2 trillion dollar R&D investment for this one piece of tech), while the su 57 costs less than $50 million and is almost as good. Russia has fewer Su 57s in its arsenal because its military doctrine is different from the US' aircraft carrier centered one.
Its stealth profile is much lower. The Su-57 can't go toe to toe with the F-35 but in most cases it doesn't matter that much.
Air warfare is not a game of one v one duels. It is a duel of opposing systems with radars, armaments, SAMs, and comms.
The Su-57 carries the very long ranged air-to-air R-37M missile with a 400 km range. The longest-ranged American AA missile is the AIM-120D with 150 km.
The Su-57 is stealthy enough to get close to critical large American aircraft like AWACS and tankers and ''assassinate'' them from afar.
This blinds the rest of the Air Force/Carrier Group and renders them vulnerable to attack.
The Su-57 also can carry 4 Kh-69 missiles. It's a new Russian cruise missile that's ultra-stealthy and on par with the American JASSM.
It was used this month to deadly effect and demolished the Kiev Thermal Power Plant. NATO-supplied anti-aircraft systems like the Patriot and IRIS-T were unable to stop it.
So, the Su-57 can assassinate vital nato aircraft from afar and it can launch cruise missile strikes on nato radars, military installations, and civilian infrastructure from afar without being detected or destroyed.
Russians have an order for 76 Su-57s but this could be expanded. Putin penny pinched on defense for almost 10 years before 2022 and spent the half the money that was originally allotted for the state rearmament programs. This led to a lot of projects getting delayed.
The army in particular was ignored and the drawbacks became apparent in the first two years of the Ukraine war.
But thankfully, Russia has embarked on a crash course industrialization and has made up most of the deficiencies.
Joe you really are the Thucydides of our age, or perhaps our Edward Gibbon. Future generations will want to know what in blazes brought this empire down, and your writings, commentary and journalism will be a prime source. You are a true scholar, and a workhorse at that, bless your heart.
he is also the "James Gandolfini" and "John Travolta from Grease" of our time
I have no idea who those people you mentioned were, but Joe is the Eric Striker of our time. 'Nuff said. HAIL STRIKER!!!
In all seriousness, Joe's analysis is amazing in many ways. He sees what ZOG sees/knows, but from the perspective of someone who isn't a demonic parasite.
We love you, Joe!
Wait... Joe is Eric Striker ?!!?? I thought he was the reviewer on the 'No Nonsense Whisky' YouTube channel !
The degree of filth promoted and created by the US ruling elite is staggering. Hopefully this farce of an empire will soon end; one way or another. Thank you Mr. Jordan.
Joseph, I recently read the Niall Ferguson article “We’re All Soviets Now” linked through a Russian nationalist telegram channel, and it seems to be highly convergent with if not directly influenced by this ongoing series of yours. For major distinctions, Niall does not address the Jewish element at all in his piece, and he more laments than derides the degeneration of American society for the disadvantage it will cause the US in its struggle against the “Chinese Axis” in this new Cold War. This is of course a struggle in which he hopes the American empire prevails. Despite these distinctions, the similarities of his piece are so striking that I couldn’t help but wonder if there were not some direct material theft at hand. I would be curious to hear your thoughts on the matter . . .
https://www.thefp.com/p/were-all-soviets-now
Great article.
This has been my pet peeve for a long time. Elites across the world follow the prestige trail and tend to imitate the political, economic, and cultural norms of the most powerful and prestigious power in the region.
There are deep historical precedents for this.
Most of Western Europe after the fall of the Western Roman Empire was not Christian. Germans were forcibly Christianized by Charlemagne but Scandinavia and Poland were never conquered. They voluntarily Christianized and established the catholic and manorial system. Why? Because that's what the Franks did.
The power and prestige of the Frankish realms were so great that others attempted to emulate it and adopted their civilizational model.
Same with Russia and Byzantium. Russians had to choose from Orthodox Christianity, Islam, and Judaism but went for Orthodoxy because they were awed by the splendor and sophistication of Constantinople and the Byzantine Empire.
In the 18th century, all of Europe adopted the model of the French court and royal and ducal courts spoke French. Even distant Russia and French enemies like Holland and Austria. Why? Because France was the most populous and most powerful country in Europe. Her achievements in culture and science were rivaled by none. And the splendor of Versailles awed all.
Elites everywhere adopted the French model as it was the most prestigious.
The same with Britain. Most of the world didn't have parliaments at the start of the 19th century but by the beginning of the 20th, they did. The power and prestige of the British Empire that dominated the world caused everyone to make overtures toward parliamentary democracy and capitalism.
It's the same thing with the US. The wealth, power, and prestige of America captivated the world throughout the Cold War. Everyone wanted to be like her.
This ofc went into overdrive after American victory in the Cold War and elites around the world adopted American-style feminism, sexual freedom, individualism, low culture, and negrolatry.
There's no reason to believe that this status quo will continue forever. Very soon, America could very well become low status and uncouth, and elites embarrassed to be associated with the values it promotes.
Nye’s theory is correct. Soft power is efficient in its use of resources as compared to coercive power. Also its core is based in voluntary decision making. But at the root of success for soft power to work it has to be universally inspiring. It has to be based on the natural law of mankind. Encompassing the values of family, community, loyalty and compassion.
Jesus Christ is the perfect example of soft power emanating from the concept of the natural order. He was right in exclaiming that the “deniers” , the ones whose faith was based on his emergence, and who should have easily recognised him, are the people who worship Satan. We see these same people exercise soft power using Satan’s values. Universally unacceptable values that alienate the best of all peoples everywhere. For the first time in history their expulsion will be spherical not just local
The comparison of the Su-57 and the F-35 hurts the factuality of your article. The Su-57 is inferior in stealth, but the most important distinction are numbers: the Russians haven‘t produced many of them; you should look up the production numbers of the F-35.
One should rather question if American Aerial Superiority is still the huge forces multiplier it used to be in past decades considering advanced developements in missile and drone technology as a way of delivering payloads at substancial lower cost and with greater tactical and strategic flexibility.
This is looking purely at specs and numbers, rather than research capability and practicality. The F 35 costs around $110 million per jet (a lot more if we take into account insane $2 trillion dollar R&D investment for this one piece of tech), while the su 57 costs less than $50 million and is almost as good. Russia has fewer Su 57s in its arsenal because its military doctrine is different from the US' aircraft carrier centered one.
Its stealth profile is much lower. The Su-57 can't go toe to toe with the F-35 but in most cases it doesn't matter that much.
Air warfare is not a game of one v one duels. It is a duel of opposing systems with radars, armaments, SAMs, and comms.
The Su-57 carries the very long ranged air-to-air R-37M missile with a 400 km range. The longest-ranged American AA missile is the AIM-120D with 150 km.
The Su-57 is stealthy enough to get close to critical large American aircraft like AWACS and tankers and ''assassinate'' them from afar.
This blinds the rest of the Air Force/Carrier Group and renders them vulnerable to attack.
The Su-57 also can carry 4 Kh-69 missiles. It's a new Russian cruise missile that's ultra-stealthy and on par with the American JASSM.
It was used this month to deadly effect and demolished the Kiev Thermal Power Plant. NATO-supplied anti-aircraft systems like the Patriot and IRIS-T were unable to stop it.
So, the Su-57 can assassinate vital nato aircraft from afar and it can launch cruise missile strikes on nato radars, military installations, and civilian infrastructure from afar without being detected or destroyed.
Russians have an order for 76 Su-57s but this could be expanded. Putin penny pinched on defense for almost 10 years before 2022 and spent the half the money that was originally allotted for the state rearmament programs. This led to a lot of projects getting delayed.
The army in particular was ignored and the drawbacks became apparent in the first two years of the Ukraine war.
But thankfully, Russia has embarked on a crash course industrialization and has made up most of the deficiencies.